10/14/2019 8:42 PM
Our five stage AT consultation model at PROVAIL includes:
1. Method
2. Intake
3. Planning
4. Implementation
5. Analysis
“A goal without a plan is just a wish” – Antoine de Saint-Exupery
After working through the Method and Intake stages detailed in the previous post it is time to engage in stage three, Planning. As it sits in the middle of our five stage model, Planning acts as the lynch pin stage holding all five stages together. Relying on a solid agreement of Method with concise and comprehensive Intake data, the Planning stage is the pivot point upon which successful Implementation and Analysis depends.
Planning does not have to be complicated. In fact, it should make perfect sense to every single member of the team since they will be involved in the process to some degree. Remember, our role as consultant at this point is still to act primarily as the point person, organizer, convener, and as process guide to keep efforts focused and moving the right direction. After completing Method and Intake we have enough information to meet with the team to present the bones of a plan upon which the team collaboratively will add meaty details.
Our Planning process includes the following guiding principles:
-Well-organized, time-managed meeting
-Rational scaffolding based on Method and Intake to guide Planning
-Collaborative process start to finish
-Creative problem solving
-Energized discussion and debate
-Mutual agreement on outcomes
Specific results of Planning include:
-Define training and Implementation goals
-Define and disseminate Implementation roadmap
-Fully define targeted consultant role
-Assign duties/responsibilities to all team members
-Note targeted milestones
-Assure there is no confusion for any team member
We use a variety of tools to help manage information, time, and the attention of the AT team depending on the focus of the consulting contract. For instance, let’s use the often-encountered case of a student and AT team struggling to successfully implement an AAC system. We may have discovered during Intake that there were few points of agreement on what specific ways the student is already communicating successfully, and therefore confusion on how best to focus energy, modeling, and providing communicative structure for success.
We frequently use the Communication Matrix as a way for AT Team members to independently generate a matrix we can efficiently compare and discuss to find areas of alignment. As has been suggested in previous posts on this forum, the Communication Matrix is assigned as homework for team members between Intake and Planning and provides common vocabulary and imposes structure on how we envision the student’s areas of strength and need. We have also found that it single handedly lifts the vocabulary and communication behavior awareness of all team members (AT specialists, teachers, SLPs, paraprofessionals, parents, etc.) more efficiently than bringing everyone together for an in-service, which is rarely as participatory or student focused.
We also often use “shorthand” matrices during facilitated discussion to provide an informed and focused view of the student’s communication methods and skills. I have attached a few examples below, including a worksheet to better show the spontaneous, creative process engaged while we are meeting as a team to formulate a plan.
After efficiently determining areas of agreement and potential intervention strategies, the single most important outcome of the Planning stage is the development of a roadmap detailing the specific path of Implementation. This roadmap provides clear definition of where implementation will happen, how it will occur, who will take responsibility, expected outcomes, and how progress will be measured. All team members need to agree that the roadmap addresses the appropriate goals, makes sense, passes the “doable” test, and be bought in to the process.
A planning roadmap is rarely narrative, usually a well organized to-do list in the form of a matrix listing goals, how that goal is achieved, and who is responsible for tracking progress. It should include all the expected Planning outcomes bullet-point listed above and, like any good plan, should paint a clear picture of forward motion from point A to B to C for anyone who looks at it. If someone new to the AT team needs an in-service to understand the AT roadmap it is far too complicated and needs to be rethought.
At the point a plan is agreed upon it is time to hit the go button and engage the final two stages, Implementation and Analysis, which I’ll discuss in the next post. Thanks for reading!
This post is part of the collection
© 2024 Charity Rowland, Ph.D.
Site by State33 and Smith & Connors
Your information will not be saved unless you register. You may register for free at anytime throughout the tryout by clicking the orange button bottom right.
The information you enter in the assessment is completely secure and cannot be identified. When you use this free service, we ask you to provide some very basic information about the individual you are assessing (gender, age, ethnic background, country of residence, disability and specific impairments) and your relationship to that person. However, we have no way of indentifying who has used this service.
Many teachers require their college students in communication disorders or child development classes to complete a Communication Matrix online. Please have your students use the Test Drive site for this purpose. You may ask them to print out the Profile and Communication Skills List as proof of their work.
The only way I know that he wants something is because he fusses or whines when he's unhappy or uncomfortable, and he smiles, makes noises or calms down when he's happy and comfortable. Does this statement describe your child?
She doesn't come to me to let me know what she wants, but it's easy for me to figure out, because she tries to do things for herself. She knows what she wants, and her behavior shows me what she wants. If she runs out of something to eat, she will just try to get more, rather than trying to get me to give her more.
Does this statement describe your child?
He knows how to get me to do something for him. He uses some of the kinds of behaviors below to communicate:
Does this statement describe your child?
Each question you will see is related to a certain message that your child might be able to express using a variety of behaviors. Read the question and decide whether your child is able to express the message described using any of the listed behaviors. If the answer is YES, then you must also decide whether your child has mastered the use of each behavior or whether it is still at an emerging stage. Check either the mastered or emerging box next to any behaviors your child uses to express the message. Use the following definitions to decide whether a behavior is mastered or emerging
– Does this independently most of the time when the opportunity arises
– Does this in a number of dierent contexts, and with dierent people
– Does this inconsistently
–
Only does this when prompted or encouraged to do so. Only does this in one or two contexts or with one person.
Each question you will see is related to a certain message that your child might be able to express using a variety of behaviors. Read the question and decide whether your child is able to express the message described using any of the listed behaviors. If the answer is YES, then you must also decide whether your child has mastered the use of each behavior or whether it is still at an emerging stage. Check either the mastered or emerging box next to any behaviors your child uses to express the message. Use the following definitions to decide whether a behavior is mastered or emerging